The consequence: Both deleted many of their old links

mebrokenheard11

That's just the way it is. My employees feel this again and again when they write to normal webmasters. They say across the board “We don’t want anything to do with SEO” because they see SEOcracy in the email signature. Why? Because they get the same emails every day, which go something like this: “Dear webmaster, I stumbled upon your site by chance while browsing the internet. We are agency XY and need a link for our customer Z. Please tell me the conditions, how much a link costs and when it will go online.


Our cover letters, on the other hand, have an average of India Car Owner Phone Number List words, each time new. That's more than some agencies have in the texts containing the links! And with good reason: a standard cover letter is nowhere near enough to really convince someone to add a link. What I see at the moment We are constantly looking at the competition, especially in a fairly competitive field. Two huge sites were recently penalized there. They both plummeted from about 20 visibility index to 2. While the first page no longer does any link building at all (great signal to Google), the second page now only builds “good” links. However, by “good” the SEO team or their agency means links from major daily newspapers, which are currently selling like hot cakes in the SEO scene.



Many SEOs think that by “good links” they mean those from major newspapers. I have known these big news sites from Osnabrück or Saxony as link sellers since I became an SEO, without having to look in a list. Simply because they have crossed my path dozens of times. And Google isn't exactly known for having only complete idiots working there. Every quality rater who has seen even a hundred purchased links knows these sites by name. And these people are looking at thousands of links, some hundreds of thousands! “It’s not scalable” Of course, some will think that such an approach would not be scalable.