Ultimately, always keep in mind that the finished

brokenheard320@

This especially applies to the written interview. Because during telephone interviews or on-site interviews, you can also ask questions during the conversation. But here, too, it is sometimes only during the evaluation that you notice when answers are not entirely conclusive. The following problems may occur: Problem A: Short answers without much added value A big problem with written interviews: the answers are too brief and don't reveal much. This is how you can solve it: Ask again (if possible) and formulate questions even more specifically or make the best of it and do further research yourself.


Problem B: Excessive input There are interviewees who focus on the essentials Special Data and interviewees who have a lot to say. More is not always better, especially when content is repetitive. This is what you can do: Read the answers carefully: Are aspects repeated? Can passages be deleted without distorting the meaning? Think about whether the answers offer real added value for the reader or whether they absolutely have to be in your text. If you doubt, leave it out: If in doubt, you should focus on the essentials and delete less relevant answers/positions. article must be well-rounded and provide the reader with the best possible information.



Your challenge as an editor is to turn every interview (no matter how “good” or “bad”) into a text that is exciting and informative to read. 6. Get the interview into shape After the evaluation, you still have to put the interview into the right form. Depending on the type of interview, there are different types of interviews that can fit. Note: I am only referring to written interviews and not to audio or video formats. Interview verbatim Question, answer, question, answer – the classic interview that you can find in many newspapers.